<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">aiae</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0534-3232</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2531-2308</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Instituto de Actuarios Españoles</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26360/2026_06</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research article</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Tracking climate extremes in the United Kingdom: The United Kingdom Actuarial Climate Index</article-title>
<trans-title-group xml:lang="es"><trans-title>Análisis de los extremos climáticos en el Reino Unido: El índice actuarial del clima del Reino Unido</trans-title></trans-title-group>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1280-6442</contrib-id><name><surname>Nuntasuwan</surname><given-names>Jutatip</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/><email>jn4011@hw.ac.uk</email></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0643-4921</contrib-id><name><surname>Boado-Penas</surname><given-names>María del Carmen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>c.boado@hw.ac.uk</email></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><institution-wrap><institution content-type="orgname">Heriot-Watt University and the Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences</institution></institution-wrap>, <addr-line content-type="city">Edinburgh</addr-line>, <country country="GB">UK</country></aff>
<author-notes><corresp id="cor1">Corresponding author: <email>jn4011@hw.ac.uk</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<fpage>107</fpage>
<lpage>124</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2026</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Instituto de Actuarios Españoles</copyright-holder>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.26360/2026_06"/>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The Actuaries Climate Index (ACI), jointly developed by a consortium of North American actuarial bodies, is a climate monitoring metric designed to track long-term changes in extreme weather and sea level conditions across the United States and Canada. Rather than focusing on average climate conditions, the ACI quantifies changes in the frequency of extreme events (including high and low temperatures, heavy precipitation, prolonged droughts, high winds, and coastal sea level changes) which are critical drivers of climate risk for society and the insurance sector.</p><p>In this paper, we construct the ACI for the United Kingdom, analyse its trends, identify the weather-related variables that contribute most to the index, and compare our results with the Australian Actuaries Climate Index (AACI). Our findings highlight the sensitivity of climate risk assessments to the selection of underlying variables, suggesting that the design and interpretation of composite climate indices should be carefully tailored to their intended application and regional context.</p></abstract>
<trans-abstract xml:lang="es"><p>El Índice Climático Actuarial (<italic>Actuaries Climate Index</italic>, ACI), desarrollado conjuntamente por un consorcio de organizaciones actuariales norteamericanas, es un indicador diseñado para analizar los cambios a largo plazo en los fenómenos meteorológicos extremos y en el nivel del mar en Estados Unidos y Canadá. En lugar de centrarse en las condiciones climáticas medias, el ACI cuantifica los cambios en la frecuencia de los eventos extremos, incluidas las temperaturas máximas y mínimas extremas, las precipitaciones intensas, las sequías prolongadas, los vientos fuertes y las variaciones del nivel del mar en las zonas costeras, que constituyen factores determinantes del riesgo climático para la sociedad y el sector asegurador.</p><p>En este artículo, construimos el ACI para el Reino Unido, analizamos su evolución, identificamos las variables meteorológicas que más contribuyen al índice y comparamos nuestros resultados con los del Índice Climático Actuarial de Australia (<italic>Australian Actuaries Climate Index</italic>, AACI). Nuestros resultados muestran que el ACI puede variar considerablemente en función de las variables seleccionadas para su construcción, lo que pone de manifiesto la importancia de tener en cuenta las características climáticas de cada región a la hora de elaborar estos índices.</p></trans-abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>extreme weather events</kwd><kwd>climate risk</kwd><kwd>climate indices</kwd><kwd>United Kingdom</kwd></kwd-group>
<kwd-group xml:lang="es"><kwd>eventos meteorológicos extremos</kwd><kwd>riesgo climático</kwd><kwd>índices climáticos</kwd><kwd>Reino Unido</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="introduction">
  <label>1</label><title>INTRODUCTION</title>
  <p>Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of many
  climate-related hazards worldwide. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
  (AR6) reports that global surface temperature in 2011–2020 was 1.09°C
  higher than in 1850–1900, and that this warming has already led to
  more frequent and intense hot extremes and heatwaves, along with fewer
  cold extremes. AR6 also reports that heavy precipitation has
  intensified in many regions, while drought, flooding, tropical
  cyclones, and compound events such as heat-drought combinations and
  coastal flooding are becoming more important climate risks (IPCC,
  2021). As these hazards continue to evolve, there is a growing need
  for indicators that can consistently track climate extremes and
  support climate risk assessment over time.</p>
  <p>The Actuaries Climate Index (ACI; American Academy of Actuaries et
  al., 2018), launched in November 2016, is a climate monitoring metric
  designed to track long term changes in extreme weather and sea level
  conditions across Canada and the continental United States. It was
  jointly developed by a consortium of North American actuarial bodies:
  the Society of Actuaries (SOA), the Canadian Institute of Actuaries
  (CIA), the Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS), and the American Academy
  of Actuaries (AAA). The collaboration was coordinated through a
  dedicated Climate Change Committee, with support from climate science
  partners who provided data and helped develop the methodology. Rather
  than focusing on mean climate conditions, the ACI specifically
  quantifies changes in the frequency of extreme events, such as
  unusually high or low temperatures, heavy precipitation, prolonged
  drought, high winds, and changes in coastal sea level.</p>
  <p>The index serves as an objective, transparent, and educational
  tool, informing actuaries, policymakers, researchers, and the public
  about changes in the prevalence of extreme climate events. These
  changes are increasingly relevant for risk assessment, financial
  modelling, and adaptation planning. By summarising multiple climate
  extremes into a single consistent metric, the ACI provides a framework
  for comparing climate risk across regions.</p>
  <p>Several studies have explored the applicability of the ACI
  methodology in Europe. For example, Zhou et al. (2023) developed an
  actuarial climate index for the Iberian Peninsula based on the North
  American ACI framework, Garrido et al. (2026) for France, and Rogo et
  al. (2025) for Italy. These developments highlight the adaptability of
  the ACI methodology and provide a basis for constructing a comparable
  index for the UK.</p>
  <p>A related measure, the Actuaries Climate Risk Index (ACRI; American
  Academy of Actuaries, 2020), was later introduced to assess the
  economic risks associated with climate-related hazards by linking
  climate indicators with financial loss data.</p>
  <p>Following the development of the ACI, the Australian Actuaries
  Climate Index (AACI; Actuaries Institute, 2025) was first launched in
  2018 to monitor changes in the frequency of extreme weather conditions
  and sea levels in Australia. Although the AACI was inspired by the
  ACI, its methodology differs due to the use of different climate
  variables, thresholds, and reference periods reflecting regional
  climate characteristics; these differences are discussed in Section
  6.</p>
  <p>The aim of this paper is to construct the ACI for the UK (UKACI)
  and explore historical trends in extreme weather-related events. The
  remainder of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes
  changes in the UK climate. The ACI framework and the data used in this
  study are outlined in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. Section 5
  analyses the weather-related variables included in the ACI and
  presents the calculation of the index for the UK. In Section 6, we
  present a sensitivity analysis of the UKACI and compare it with the
  methodology of the AACI. Finally, Section 7 concludes with a
  discussion and final remarks.</p>
</sec>

<sec id="changes-in-the-uk-climate">
  <label>2</label><title>CHANGES IN THE UK CLIMATE</title>
  <p>The United Kingdom has a mild climate, largely influenced by the
  nearby Atlantic Ocean and prevailing westerly winds. As a result,
  temperatures are generally moderate compared with other regions at
  similar latitudes. The long-term average annual temperature for the UK
  is approximately 9–10°C, although this varies across regions due to
  latitude, elevation, and proximity to the coast (Kendon et al.,
  2025).</p>
  <p>The United Kingdom has experienced significant climatic changes
  over recent decades. Observational records indicate that the UK
  climate has become warmer and wetter compared with much of the
  twentieth century (Kendon et al., 2025). Notably, the ten warmest
  years on record in the UK have all occurred since 2002 (Fung &amp;
  Lowe, 2023; Kendon et al., 2025), highlighting the strong warming
  trend observed in recent decades. According to the Met Office, the
  UK’s average temperature has increased by approximately 0.9°C since
  the period 1961–1990, with the most rapid warming observed since the
  1990s. This warming has contributed to an increased frequency of
  extreme high temperature events and heatwaves, particularly in
  southern England. Climate projections suggest that temperatures will
  continue to increase throughout the twenty-first century, with
  particularly pronounced warming during summer months (Met Office,
  2022).</p>
  <p>Changes in precipitation patterns have also been documented.
  Historical records indicate that five of the ten wettest years in the
  UK since 1836 have occurred since 1998, suggesting an increase in wet
  extremes in recent decades (Kendon et al., 2025). More recently,
  during the period 2010–2019, UK summers mean annual precipitation has
  increased by approximately 11%, while mean winter precipitation has
  increased by around 4% in terms of total rainfall amount (millimetres)
  compared with the 1981–2010 baseline (Kendon et al., 2022). These
  changes are broadly consistent with climate projections that
  anticipate wetter winters and an increased frequency of heavy rainfall
  events.</p>
  <p>Rainfall patterns across the UK exhibit substantial spatial
  variability. Although climate change affects the entire country, the
  distribution of precipitation is highly heterogeneous, reflecting the
  influence of atmospheric circulation patterns and topographical
  features. In particular, rainfall amounts tend to be higher along the
  western coasts, with especially high levels observed in western
  Scotland, while eastern regions are generally drier.</p>
  <p>Overall, the available evidence indicates that extreme weather
  events, including heavy rainfall and heatwaves, are becoming more
  frequent or more intense in the UK. These developments highlight the
  need for robust indicators capable of systematically monitoring
  changes in climate-related extremes and their potential implications
  for economic and financial risk.</p>
  <p>These climatic changes increase the severity of climate-related
  physical risks affecting the UK. Perils such as flooding, storms,
  heatwaves, and droughts are becoming more damaging under changing
  climatic conditions. These perils can damage buildings and transport
  networks, disrupt business activity, threaten food security, and
  increase pressure on public health systems (Kendon et al., 2025; Met
  Office, 2026). In other words, climate change is not only changing the
  climate baseline but also worsening the very events that drive
  physical losses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="actuaries-climate-index-aci-framework">
  <label>3</label><title>ACTUARIES CLIMATE INDEX (ACI) FRAMEWORK</title>
  <p>The Actuaries Climate Index (ACI) consists of six components, see
  Table  <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">1</xref>, designed to
  capture changes in different types of climate extremes, including
  temperature, precipitation, wind, drought, and sea level. Each
  component is presented as a monthly time series beginning in 1961 and
  is derived from data collected from a large network of meteorological
  and coastal tide stations across the United States and Canada
  (American Academy of Actuaries et al., 2018).</p>
  <p>All measurements are evaluated relative to a 30-year reference
  period from 1961 to 1990, and the ACI is expressed in terms of
  anomalies from this baseline.</p>
  <table-wrap id="tab1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Components of the Actuaries Climate Index</p></caption>
    <table>
      <colgroup>
        <col width="24%" />
        <col width="76%" />
      </colgroup>
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <th>Description</th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td>Warm temperature</td>
          <td>Frequency of daily maximum and minimum temperatures above
          the 90th percentile.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Cool temperature</td>
          <td>Frequency of daily maximum and minimum temperatures below
          the 10th percentile.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Precipitation</td>
          <td>Maximum five-day precipitation in month.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Drought</td>
          <td>Maximum consecutive dry days in year.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Wind Speed</td>
          <td>Frequency of daily wind speed above the 90th
          percentile.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Sea Level</td>
          <td>Change in sea level.</td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </table-wrap>
  <p><bold>Warm temperature (T90)</bold></p>
  <p>This component represents unusually warm temperature events. An
  increase in the frequency of very warm days is a key indicator of
  climate warming and reflects a shift in the upper tail of the
  temperature distribution. It is calculated using both daily maximum
  temperature (TX) and daily minimum temperature (TN). Since the daily
  maximum typically occurs during the afternoon and the daily minimum
  around dawn, TX and TN are commonly interpreted as proxies for daytime
  and nighttime conditions, respectively.</p>
  <p>Warm temperature events are defined as temperatures exceeding the
  90th percentile threshold for each calendar day, estimated from a
  30-year reference period. The percentile calculation is smoothed using
  a five-day moving window centred on each calendar day.</p>
  <p>For daytime and nighttime temperatures separately, the number of
  values above the threshold is counted and converted into the
  percentage of warm days (TX90p) and warm nights (TN90p) for each
  month.</p>
  <p>From the reference period, 12 monthly reference means,
  <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\mu_{ref}(j)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>,
  and 12 standard deviations, <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\sigma_{ref}(j)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>,
  are calculated, where <italic>j</italic> represents the calendar month
  (<italic>j</italic>= January, February, ..., December).</p>
  <p>Standardised anomalies are then computed as</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[TX90p_{std}(j,k) = \frac{TX90p(j,k) - \mu_{ref}TX90p(j)}{\sigma_{ref}TX90p(j)}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>and</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[TN90p_{std}(j,k) = \frac{TN90p(j,k) - \mu_{ref}TN90p(j)}{\sigma_{ref}TN90p(j)}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>where <italic>j</italic> denotes the calendar month and
  <italic>k</italic> denotes the year (<italic>k</italic>= 1961, 1962,
  ..., 2024).</p>
  <p>Because warm days and warm nights tend to occur simultaneously, the
  final warm temperature anomaly (T90) is defined as the average of the
  two standardised indices:</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[T90_{std}(j,k) = \frac{1}{2}\left( TX90p_{std}(j,k) + TN90p_{std}(j,k) \right).]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>.</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p><bold>Cool temperature (T10)</bold></p>
  <p>In contrast to warm temperature events, the cool temperature
  component represents unusually cold temperature conditions. A
  decreasing frequency of very cold days indicates a shift in the lower
  tail of the temperature distribution.</p>
  <p>Cool temperature events are defined as temperatures falling below
  the 10th percentile threshold for each calendar day. The percentile
  calculation is smoothed using a five-day moving window centred on each
  calendar day and estimated from a 30-year reference.</p>
  <p>The methodology is similar to the warm temperatures calculation,
  except that the cool temperature threshold is defined using the 10th
  percentile. Thus, the cool days (TX10p) and cool nights (TN10p)
  standardised anomalies are calculated as</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[TX10p_{std}(j,k) = \frac{TX10p(j,k) - \mu_{ref}TX10p(j)}{\sigma_{ref}TX10p(j)}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>and</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[TN10p_{std}(j,k) = \frac{TN10p(j,k) - \mu_{ref}TN10p(j)}{\sigma_{ref}TN10p(j)}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>where <italic>j</italic> denotes the calendar month and
  <italic>k</italic> denotes the year (<italic>k</italic>= 1961, 1962,
  ..., 2024).</p>
  <p>The final cool temperature anomaly (T10) is defined as</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[T10_{std}(j,k) = \frac{1}{2}\left( TX10p_{std}(j,k) + TN10p_{std}(j,k) \right).]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>.</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p><bold>Precipitation (P)</bold></p>
  <p>The precipitation component represents the extreme rainfall and is
  based on the maximum five-day precipitation (Rx5day) index. The Rx5day
  is defined as the highest accumulated precipitation over any
  consecutive five-day period within a given month.</p>
  <p>Monthly Rx5day anomalies are standardised relative to the reference
  period using the corresponding monthly mean,
  <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\mu_{ref}(j)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>,
  and standard deviation, <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\sigma_{ref}(j)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>:</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[Rx5day_{std}(j,k) = \frac{Rx5day(j,k) - \mu_{ref}Rx5day(j)}{\sigma_{ref}Rx5day(j)}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>where <italic>j</italic> denotes the calendar month
  (<italic>j</italic>= January, February, ..., December) and
  <italic>k</italic> denotes the year (<italic>k</italic>= 1961, 1962,
  ..., 2024).</p>
  <p><bold>Drought (D)</bold></p>
  <p>The drought component represents dry conditions and is quantified
  using the Consecutive Dry Days (CDD) index. A dry day is defined as a
  day with daily precipitation less than 1 mm. For each year, the
  longest dry spell is identified as the annual Maximum Consecutive Dry
  Days (MaxCDD).</p>
  <p>The annual MaxCDD mean, <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\mu_{ref}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>,
  and standard deviation, <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\sigma_{ref}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>,
  are calculated from the reference period and used as baseline
  statistics.</p>
  <p>Monthly MaxCDD are obtained by linear interpolation</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[MaxCDD(12,k) = MaxCDD(k)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>and</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[MaxCDD(j,k) = \frac{12 - j}{12}\left( MaxCDD(12,k - 1) \right) + \frac{j}{12}\left( MaxCDD(12,k) \right)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>where <italic>j</italic> denotes the calendar month
  (<italic>j</italic>= January, February, ..., December) and
  <italic>k</italic> denotes the year (<italic>k</italic>= 1961, 1962,
  ..., 2024).</p>
  <p>Standardised drought anomalies are then calculated as</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[MaxCDD_{std}(j,k) = \frac{MaxCDD(j,k) - \mu_{ref}MaxCDD}{\sigma_{ref}MaxCDD}.]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>.</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p><bold>Wind speed (W)</bold></p>
  <p>Extreme wind conditions are represented using wind power (WP),
  calculated from daily mean wind speed as</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[WP = \frac{1}{2}\rho w^{3}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>where <italic>w</italic> is the daily mean wind speed and
  <italic>ρ</italic> is the air density (1.23
  kg/m<inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[^{3}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mi></mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>).</p>
  <p>Extreme wind events are defined as wind power values exceeding the
  90th percentile threshold. The threshold is estimated for each
  calendar day using a 30-year reference period as</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[WP_{ref}(i,j) = \mu_{WP}(i,j,k) + 1.28\sigma_{WP}(i,j,k)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.28</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>where <italic>i</italic> denotes the calendar day
  (<italic>i</italic>= 1, 2,..., 30, 31), <italic>j</italic> denotes the
  calendar month (<italic>j</italic>= January, February, ..., December),
  and <italic>k</italic> denotes the year within the reference
  period.</p>
  <p>For each month, the number of days with wind power exceeding the
  threshold is counted and converted into the percentage of extreme wind
  (WP90).</p>
  <p>Monthly WP90 anomalies are standardised relative to the reference
  period using the corresponding monthly mean,
  <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\mu_{ref}(j)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>,
  and standard deviation, <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\sigma_{ref}(j)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>:</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[WP90_{std}(j,k) = \frac{WP90(j,k) - \mu_{ref}WP90(j)}{\sigma_{ref}WP90(j)}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>where <italic>j</italic> denotes the calendar month
  (<italic>j</italic>= January, February, ..., December) and
  <italic>k</italic> denotes the year (<italic>k</italic>= 1961, 1962,
  ..., 2024).</p>
  <p><bold>Sea level (S)</bold></p>
  <p>The sea level component represents changes in sea level derived
  from hourly tide-gauge observations at coastal stations. Monthly mean
  sea level (S) values are calculated from the hourly records.</p>
  <p>Monthly sea level anomalies are then standardised relative to the
  reference period using the corresponding monthly mean,
  <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\mu_{ref}(j)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>,
  and standard deviation, <inline-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\sigma_{ref}(j)]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></inline-formula>:</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[S_{std}(j,k) = \frac{S(j,k) - \mu_{ref}S(j)}{\sigma_{ref}S(j)}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
  <p>where <italic>j</italic> denotes the calendar month
  (<italic>j</italic>= January, February, ..., December) and
  <italic>k</italic> denotes the year (<italic>k</italic>= 1961, 1962,
  ..., 2024).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="data-and-implementation">
  <label>4</label><title>DATA AND IMPLEMENTATION</title>
  <p>This paper is based on station-based observational data spanning
  1961–2024 and represents six climate components of the ACI.</p>
  <p>Temperature and precipitation data are obtained from the Global
  Historical Climatology Network Daily (GHCNd; NOAA National Centers for
  Environmental Information, 2025), providing daily observations from
  land-based stations. Wind speed data are sourced from the Met Office
  Integrated Data Archive (Met Office, 2012), where hourly observations
  are aggregated to daily means and used to calculate wind power.
  Lastly, the sea level data are obtained from the Permanent Service for
  Mean Sea Level (PSMSL, 2026; Holgate et al., 2013), providing monthly
  mean values from coastal tide-gauge stations.</p>
  <p>To ensure data quality, only stations with less than 50% missing
  observations over the study period are retained. Remaining missing
  values are not infilled and are excluded from calculations. Monthly
  averages are computed using available stations only; consequently, the
  number of contributing stations varies over time.</p>
  <p>After applying these criteria, the final dataset consists of 98
  temperature stations, 106 precipitation stations, 125 wind stations,
  and 20 tide-gauge stations distributed across the United Kingdom.</p>
  <p>The UK Actuarial Climate Index (UKACI) is constructed to represent
  the overall state of climate extremes in the United Kingdom. Monthly
  observations are first aggregated across all available stations to
  obtain national-level time series for each climate component. The
  UKACI is then computed from these aggregated series as the arithmetic
  mean of the six components, with equal weighting, following the
  formulation of the North American Actuaries Climate Index
  (ACI)<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1">1</xref>. The cool temperature
  component (T10) enters with a negative sign to reflect its inverse
  relationship with warm temperature extremes.</p>
  <p>The UKACI is defined as follows:</p>
  <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
  <tex-math><![CDATA[\begin{aligned}
  UKACI(j,k) = \frac{1}{6}( & T90_{std}(j,k) - T10_{std}(j,k) \\
   & + Rx5day_{std}(j,k) + MaxCDD_{std}(j,k) \\
   & + WP90_{std}(j,k) + S_{std}(j,k)).
  \end{aligned}]]></tex-math>
  <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="right" style="text-align: right"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo></mml:mtd><mml:mtd columnalign="left" style="text-align: left"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="right" style="text-align: right"></mml:mtd><mml:mtd columnalign="left" style="text-align: left"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="right" style="text-align: right"></mml:mtd><mml:mtd columnalign="left" style="text-align: left"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo><mml:mi>.</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="results">
  <label>5</label><title>RESULTS</title>
  <p>This section first presents the individual components of the UKACI.
  It then constructs the aggregated UKACI series over the study period
  and examines its overall evolution and main trends.</p>
  <sec id="component-indices">
    <label>5.1</label><title>Component Indices</title>
    <p>Figures 1–8 display standardised monthly anomalies (light blue
    vertical bars) together with their five-year moving average (solid
    black line); the dotted vertical line marks the end of the 1961–1990
    reference period. The indices are reported at monthly rather than
    seasonal resolution, as the monthly series is the elementary unit at
    which the ACI is computed.</p>
    <p>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">1</xref> and
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">2</xref> show the evolution of
    the warm temperature component (T90), together with its
    sub-components for warm days (TX90p; Figure
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">2a</xref>) and warm nights
    (TN90p; Figure
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">2b</xref>).</p>
    <p>The warm temperature index (T90) exhibits a clear upward trend
    from the mid-1980s to the end of the study period, indicating an
    increasing frequency of extreme warm events. The rise in warm nights
    (TN90p) appears more pronounced than that of warm days (TX90p), with
    anomalies reaching maxima of 2.2 and 1.7, respectively, by the end
    of the study period. This suggests that nighttime temperatures are
    increasing faster than daytime temperatures.</p>
    <fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Standardised monthly anomalies of the T90 warm temperature index.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image1.png"/></fig>
<fig-group id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Standardised monthly anomalies of warm temperature indices: TX90p (warm days) and TN90p (warm nights).</p></caption><fig id="fig2a"><label>(a)</label><caption><p>TX90p (warm days)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image2.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2b"><label>(b)</label><caption><p>TN90p (warm nights)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image3.png"/></fig></fig-group>
<p>In contrast, Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">3</xref>
    and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">4</xref> show that the
    cool temperature index (T10) displays a downward trend, consistent
    with a decline in cold extremes. Both cool days (TX10p) and cool
    nights (TN10p) decrease over time, with a slightly stronger decline
    in cool days (TX10p). By the end of the study period, anomalies
    reach approximately -1.8 for cool days and -1.7 for cool nights.
    This contrasts with the warm index components, where changes in
    nighttime temperatures are more pronounced than those in daytime
    temperatures.</p>
    <p>The strong upward trend in the warm temperature index (T90),
    together with the decline in the cool temperature index (T10),
    reflects a systematic shift in the temperature distribution. This is
    consistent with observational evidence that climate change has
    increased both the frequency and intensity of temperature extremes
    in the UK (IPCC, 2021; Kendon et al., 2025).</p>
    <fig id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Standardised monthly anomalies of the T10 cool temperature index.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image4.png"/></fig>
<fig-group id="fig4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Standardised monthly anomalies of cool temperature indices: TX10p (cool days) and TN10p (cool nights).</p></caption><fig id="fig4a"><label>(a)</label><caption><p>TX10p (cool days)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4b"><label>(b)</label><caption><p>TN10p (cool nights)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image6.png"/></fig></fig-group>
<p>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">5</xref> and
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">6</xref> show the precipitation
    (RX5day) and drought (MaxCDD) indices. Both exhibit substantial
    year-to-year variability, with no clear long-term trend over the
    study period. The precipitation index component (RX5day) fluctuates
    around zero, although positive anomalies appear more frequently in
    recent decades. In contrast, the drought index component (MaxCDD)
    shows more persistent negative anomalies during the late 1990s and
    early 2000s.</p>
    <fig id="fig5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Standardised monthly anomalies of the RX5day index (maximum five-day precipitation).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image7.png"/></fig>
<p></p>
    <p>The absence of a monotonic trend does not imply that
    precipitation and drought are unaffected by climate change. Rather,
    their responses appear more complex than those of
    temperature-related indices. As discussed in Section 2, recent
    studies suggest that climate change is increasing the intensity and
    frequency of heavy rainfall events in the UK, particularly during
    autumn and winter storms, while also increasing drought risk. This
    reflects a shift towards more variable and extreme hydrological
    conditions (IPCC, 2021; Manning et al., 2024).</p>
    <p>This dual behaviour helps explain why neither the precipitation
    nor drought index exhibits a simple linear trend. Instead, the
    results are consistent with a climate system in which both wet and
    dry extremes are becoming more pronounced over time.</p>
    <fig id="fig6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p>Standardised monthly anomalies of the MaxCDD index (consecutive dry days).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image8.png"/></fig>
<p>Next, Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">7</xref>
    shows wind power anomalies, which show no clear long-term trend but
    shift towards predominantly negative values from around the 1980s
    onwards. This pattern is consistent with previous studies, which
    generally find weaker and less robust changes in wind extremes
    compared to temperature and precipitation (American Academy of
    Actuaries et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2023; Garrido et al.,
    2026).</p>
    <fig id="fig7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p>Standardised monthly anomalies of wind power.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image9.png"/></fig>
<p>Unlike temperature extremes, wind-related changes are influenced
    by complex atmospheric circulation patterns and tend to show greater
    variability over time. Previous studies in the UK have also found no
    compelling long-term trend in storminess (Kendon et al., 2025),
    while projections of future winter windstorm changes remain
    uncertain (Met Office, 2022).</p>
    <p>Finally, Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">8</xref>
    depicts the sea level anomalies, which exhibit the strongest and
    most persistent upward trend among all components. The increase
    becomes more pronounced after the reference period, reaching a
    maximum anomaly of approximately 3.5 by the end of the study
    period.</p>
    <p>Sea level rise reflects both global and regional processes. At
    the global scale, it is primarily driven by the thermal expansion of
    warming oceans and the melting of land-based ice sheets and glaciers
    (IPCC, 2021), with groundwater depletion, which ultimately drains
    into the ocean, also contributing to rising sea levels (Kuang et
    al., 2024). In the UK, this signal is further influenced by regional
    geological processes, particularly glacial isostatic adjustment. As
    a result, northern parts of the UK are gradually rising, while
    southern regions are subsiding (Palmer et al., 2018).</p>
    <fig id="fig8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p>Standardised monthly anomalies of sea level.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image10.png"/></fig>
<p>Observed data show that mean sea level around the UK has risen by
    approximately 12–16 cm since 1900, with an acceleration in recent
    decades (Marine Climate Change Impacts Partnership, 2020). This
    aligns with the strong upward trend observed in the sea level
    component of the index. The dominance of this component indicates
    that sea level rise is a key driver of long-term climate risk,
    particularly through its contribution to increasing coastal flooding
    and erosion (Climate Change Committee, 2025).</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-uk-actuarial-climate-index-ukaci">
    <label>5.2</label><title>The UK Actuarial Climate Index (UKACI)</title>
    <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">9</xref> shows the
    five-year moving averages of the six components together with the
    UKACI. The composite index exhibits a clear upward trend,
    particularly from the 1990s onwards, indicating a rise in the
    frequency of climate extreme events relative to the reference
    period.</p>
    <fig id="fig9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p>Five-year moving averages of components used in the UKACI.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image11.png"/></fig>
<p>The increase in the UKACI is mainly driven by the strong and
    persistent increases in the warm temperature (T90) and sea level (S)
    components. Among all components, sea level exhibits the largest
    increase, rising much more rapidly than the others and reaching
    values of more than 3 by the end of the study period. This is almost
    twice the magnitude of the warm temperature component, which reaches
    approximately 1.8 over the same period.</p>
    <p>In contrast, precipitation (P), drought (D), and wind (W)
    fluctuate around zero over time and contribute less consistently to
    the overall index. The cool temperature component (T10) shows a
    persistent decline, reflecting the reduction in cold extremes, but
    its contribution is smaller in magnitude than the increases in warm
    temperature and sea level.</p>
    <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">10</xref>
    presents the Pearson correlation coefficients between the
    standardised monthly series of the six components, computed over the
    full 1961-2024 period. As expected, the warm and cool temperature
    indices (T90 and T10) show a moderate negative correlation of -0.47.
    Sea level (S), on the other hand, is positively correlated with warm
    temperature (T90), with a correlation coefficient of 0.38,
    consistent with their similar long-term upward trends.</p>
    <fig id="fig10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p>Correlation heatmap of the six components (Pearson correlations of the standardised monthly series, 1961-2024).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image12.png"/></fig>
<p>These relationships are also evident in the five-year moving
    averages shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">9</xref>,
    where warm temperature and sea level both increase substantially
    over time, while the cool temperature index declines. In contrast,
    the other component pairs exhibit only weak correlations, generally
    close to zero, indicating that they vary more independently over
    time.</p>
    <p>The UKACI is comparable to previous ACI implementations,
    including those developed for North America, France, and the Iberian
    Peninsula. The main difference lies in the underlying data source,
    as previous studies typically use gridded datasets derived from
    station observations or reanalysis
    products<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn2">2</xref>, while the present
    study relies on station-based observations. Gridded datasets provide
    spatially continuous coverage, whereas station data represent
    localised measurements. The resulting index shows broadly similar
    patterns to those reported in previous studies, particularly in the
    relative importance of temperature and sea-level-related
    components.</p>
  </sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sensitivity-analysis">
  <label>6</label><title>SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS</title>
  <p>This section assesses the robustness of the UKACI to alternative
  index constructions, including principal component analysis (PCA), the
  Australian Actuaries Climate Index (AACI) formulation, and a combined
  AACI–PCA approach.</p>
  <sec id="principal-component-analysis-the-pca-based-index">
    <label>6.1</label><title>Principal Component Analysis: The PCA-based index</title>
    <p>Principal component analysis (PCA) is applied to the six
    standardised components to identify the dominant mode of
    variability.<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn3">3</xref></p>
    <p>The corresponding loadings (Table
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">2</xref>) show that the first
    principal component is mainly driven by sea level and warm
    temperature, with loadings of 0.78415 and 0.53029, respectively.
    Smaller negative contributions are associated with cool temperature
    and drought. Precipitation also contributes positively to the first
    principal component, although its loading is substantially smaller
    at 0.17023. By contrast, wind has an almost negligible loading of
    0.00897. This pattern indicates that the dominant mode of
    variability is closely associated with warming and sea level rise,
    while wind has very little influence on the index, consistent with
    the behaviour observed in the individual component indices.</p>
    <p></p>
    <table-wrap id="tab2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Loadings of the first principal component</p></caption>
      <table>
        <colgroup>
          <col width="50%" />
          <col width="50%" />
        </colgroup>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th>Component</th>
            <th>Loading</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Warm Temperature</td>
            <td>0.53029</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Cool Temperature</td>
            <td>-0.22747</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Precipitation</td>
            <td>0.17023</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Drought</td>
            <td>-0.15199</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Wind Speed</td>
            <td>0.00897</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Sea Level</td>
            <td>0.78415</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
<p>Figure 11 compares the UKACI with the PCA-based index derived
    from the first principal component. The results show that the
    PCA-based index closely follows the temporal pattern of the UKACI,
    while exhibiting a larger difference and stronger contrast between
    the earlier and later parts of the dataset. In the first part of the
    study period, the PCA-based index remains substantially below zero,
    whereas the UKACI stays much closer to zero. After the reference
    period (i.e., after 1991), however, the PCA-based index rises more
    rapidly and reaches a value of approximately 1.6 by the end of the
    study period, whereas the UKACI reaches around 1.0.</p>
    <p>This reflects the weighting structure of PCA, which gives greater
    influence to components with strong long-term trends and high
    variance, particularly sea level and warm temperature. As a result,
    the PCA-based index emphasises the dominant long-term climate signal
    more strongly than the equal-weight UKACI. Despite these differences
    in magnitude, the two indices exhibit a similar long-term upward
    trend and temporal evolution.</p>
    <fig id="fig11"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p>Five-year moving averages of the PCA-based UKACI and its components.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image13.png"/></fig>
</sec>
  <sec id="alternative-formulation-based-on-the-aaci">
    <label>6.2</label><title>Alternative Formulation Based on the AACI</title>
    <p>An alternative index is constructed following the methodology of
    the Australian Actuaries Climate Index (AACI; Actuaries Institute,
    2025)<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn4">4</xref>, which modifies the
    definitions of several components to better capture more severe
    climate events, as shown in Table
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">3</xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="tab3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Components of Australian Actuaries Climate Index</p></caption>
      <table>
        <colgroup>
          <col width="24%" />
          <col width="76%" />
        </colgroup>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th>Component</th>
            <th>Description</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Warm temperature</td>
            <td>Frequency of daily maximum and minimum temperatures
            above the 99th percentile.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Precipitation</td>
            <td>Frequency of rainfall over five consecutive days above
            the 99th percentile.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Wind Speed</td>
            <td>Frequency of daily wind gusts above the 99th
            percentile.</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Sea Level</td>
            <td>Change in sea level.</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Unlike the North America Actuaries Climate Index (ACI), the AACI
    excludes drought and cool temperature
    components<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn5">5</xref></p>
    <p><disp-formula><alternatives>
    <tex-math><![CDATA[UKAACI = \frac{1}{4}\left( T99_{std} + Rx5day_{std} + W99_{std} + S_{std} \right).]]></tex-math>
    <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="prefix">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn>99</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mn>99</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="true" form="postfix">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>.</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></p>
    <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">12</xref> shows the
    index constructed using the AACI approach. The index exhibits a much
    stronger and more persistent upward trend than the UKACI, beginning
    in the 1980s and accelerating after the reference period. By the end
    of the study period, the UKAACI reaches a value of approximately
    2.4, compared with around 1.0 for the UKACI.</p>
    <fig id="fig12"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p>Five-year moving averages of the UKAACI and its components.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image14.png"/></fig>
<p>This reflects the sensitivity of the index to the choice of
    variables and definitions. In particular, the warm temperature
    component plays a more dominant role in the UKAACI, reaching values
    close to 4 by the end of the study period. Precipitation also
    contributes more strongly than in the UKACI, with a marked increase
    after the 1990s and sustained positive anomalies thereafter. By
    contrast, sea level still shows a strong upward trend, but its
    relative influence is smaller than in the UKACI because the
    temperature and precipitation components increase more rapidly and
    exhibit much larger short-term fluctuations.</p>
    <p>Another important difference is that the AACI approach excludes
    the cool temperature and drought components. As a result, there are
    fewer components offsetting the upward trends in warm temperature,
    precipitation, and sea level, leading to a steeper increase in the
    overall index.</p>
    <p>The stronger role of precipitation is partly related to the
    change in definition. In the AACI formulation, precipitation is
    measured as the frequency of extreme events rather than the maximum
    five-day accumulation. This makes the index more sensitive to
    repeated high-intensity rainfall events and leads to larger positive
    anomalies over time.</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="aaci-with-principal-component-analysis">
    <label>6.3</label><title>AACI with Principal Component Analysis</title>
    <p>We also consider a combined approach in which principal component
    analysis is applied to the modified set of variables used in the
    AACI formulation. The loadings (Table
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref>) indicate that warm
    temperature is the dominant driver, followed by precipitation and
    sea level, with loadings of 0.76326, 0.53413, and 0.36344,
    respectively. Wind remains negligible, with loading close to
    zero.</p>
    <table-wrap id="tab4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Loadings of the first principal component</p></caption>
      <table>
        <colgroup>
          <col width="50%" />
          <col width="50%" />
        </colgroup>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th>Component</th>
            <th>Loading</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>Warm Temperature</td>
            <td>0.76326</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Precipitation</td>
            <td>0.53413</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Wind Gusts</td>
            <td>0.00633</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Sea Level</td>
            <td>0.36344</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
<p>As shown in Figure
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">13</xref>, the first principal
    component, i.e. the PCA-based UKAACI composite index, exhibits a
    marked upward trend over the study period, particularly after the
    reference period.</p>
    <fig id="fig13"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p>Five-year moving averages of the PCA-based UKAACI and its components.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image15.png"/></fig>
<p>A comparison between the UKAACI and its PCA-based counterpart
    (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">14</xref>) shows
    that the PCA-based index follows a very similar temporal pattern to
    the UKAACI but remains consistently lower throughout the study
    period. This suggests that PCA preserves the overall evolution of
    the UKAACI, while changing the scale of the index through a
    different weighting structure.</p>
    <p>Overall, all alternative formulations produce a consistent upward
    trend. Changes in methodology affect the magnitude of the index and
    the relative importance of individual components, but not its
    overall evolution. This indicates that the increase in climate
    extremes is robust to the choice of index construction. However, the
    contribution of individual components depends strongly on how
    extremes are defined and weighted.</p>
    <fig id="fig14"><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p>Five-year moving averages of the UKAACI and the PCA-based UKAACI.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image16.png"/></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="conclusion">
  <label>7</label><title>CONCLUSION</title>
  <p>This paper develops the United Kingdom Actuarial Climate Index
  (UKACI) using station-based observations from 1961 to 2024 within the
  methodological framework of the North American Actuaries Climate Index
  (ACI). Sensitivity analyses based on principal component analysis
  (PCA), the Australian Actuaries Climate Index (AACI), and a combined
  AACI–PCA approach are also conducted to assess the robustness of the
  index to alternative constructions.</p>
  <p>The results show a clear upward trend in the UKACI over the study
  period, largely driven by warm temperature and sea-level-related
  components, while precipitation, drought, and wind exhibit greater
  variability and weaker long-term trends. Although alternative index
  formulations produce differences in magnitude and component
  contributions, the overall upward trend remains consistent across
  methodologies.</p>
  <p>The sensitivity analysis highlights that the representation of
  climate extremes depends importantly on the choice of variables,
  thresholds, and weighting schemes. In particular, the AACI formulation
  places greater emphasis on severe tail events through the use of 99th
  percentile thresholds and modified definitions of precipitation and
  wind extremes, leading to larger index magnitudes and a stronger role
  for temperature and precipitation. Similarly, PCA-based approaches
  assign greater weight to components with higher variability,
  particularly sea level and warm temperature.</p>
  <p>These findings suggest that the ACI framework captures a robust
  underlying signal of increasing climate extremes in the United
  Kingdom. However, the contribution of individual components and the
  interpretation of the index depend on how climate extremes are defined
  and aggregated. Different formulations therefore emphasise different
  dimensions of climate risk, with some approaches capturing broader
  changes across the distribution of extremes and others focusing more
  strongly on rare, high-impact events.</p>
  </sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>Actuaries Institute. (2025). <italic>Australian Actuaries Climate Index</italic>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.actuaries.asn.au/climate-index">https://www.actuaries.asn.au/climate-index</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>American Academy of Actuaries. (2020). <italic>Actuaries Climate Risk Index: Preliminary findings.</italic> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://actuary.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ACRI.pdf">https://actuary.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ACRI.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>American Academy of Actuaries, Canadian Institute of Actuaries, Casualty Actuarial Society, &amp; Society of Actuaries. (2018). <italic>Actuaries Climate Index development and design</italic>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://actuariesclimateindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ACI.DevDes.2.20.pdf">https://actuariesclimateindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ACI.DevDes.2.20.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>Climate Change Committee. (2025). <italic>Progress in adapting to climate change: 2025 report to Parliament</italic>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Progress-in-adapting-to-climate-change-2025-1.pdf">https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Progress-in-adapting-to-climate-change-2025-1.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>Fung, F., &amp; Lowe, J. A. (2023). State of the past and future UK climate. In <italic>Health effects of climate change (HECC) in the UK: 2023 report</italic> (Chapter 1). UK Health Security Agency. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657043059462260721c569a6/HECC-report-2023-chapter-1-climate-projections.pdf">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/657043059462260721c569a6/HECC-report-2023-chapter-1-climate-projections.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>Garrido, J., Milhaud, X., &amp; Olympio, A. (2026). A survey of actuarial climate indices: a new index for France and its insurance applications. <italic>Annals of Actuarial Science</italic>, 1–38. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499526100414">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499526100414</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>Holgate, S. J., Matthews, A., Woodworth, P. L., Rickards, L. J., Tamisiea, M. E., Bradshaw, E., Foden, P. R., Gordon, K. M., Jevrejeva, S., &amp; Pugh, J. (2013). New data systems and products at the Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level. <italic>Journal of Coastal Research</italic>, <italic>29</italic>(3), 493–504. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00175.1">https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00175.1</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). <italic>Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</italic>. Cambridge University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>Kendon, M., Doherty, A., Hollis, D., Carlisle, E., Packman, S., Jevrejeva, S., Matthews, A., Williams, J., Garforth, J., &amp; Sparks, T. (2025). State of the UK climate in 2024. <italic>International Journal of Climatology</italic>, <italic>45</italic>(S1), Article e70010. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70010">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70010</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>Kendon, M., McCarthy, M., Jevrejeva, S., Matthews, A., Sparks, T., Garforth, J., &amp; Kennedy, J. (2022). State of the UK climate in 2021. <italic>International Journal of Climatology</italic>, <italic>42</italic>(S1), 1–80. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7787">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7787</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>Kuang, X., Liu, J., Scanlon, B. R., Jiao, J. J., Jasechko, S., Lancia, M., Biskaborn, B. K., Wada, Y., Li, H., Zeng, Z., Guo, Z., Yao, Y., Gleeson, T., Nicot, J.-P., Luo, X., Zou, Y., &amp; Zheng, C. (2024). The changing nature of groundwater in the global water cycle. <italic>Science</italic>, <italic>383</italic>(6686), Article eadf0630. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf0630">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adf0630</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>Manning, C., Kendon, E. J., Fowler, H. J., Catto, J. L., Chan, S. C., &amp; Sansom, P. G. (2024). Compound wind and rainfall extremes: Drivers and future changes over the UK and Ireland. <italic>Weather and Climate Extremes</italic>, <italic>44</italic>, Article 100673. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2024.100673">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2024.100673</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>Marine Climate Change Impacts Partnership. (2020). <italic>Marine climate change impacts: Report card 2020</italic>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.mccip.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-07/mccip-report-card-2020_webversion.pdf">https://www.mccip.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-07/mccip-report-card-2020_webversion.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>Met Office. (2012). <italic>Met Office Integrated Data Archive System (MIDAS) land and marine surface stations data (1853–current)</italic> [Data set]. NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/220a65615218d5c9cc9e4785a3234bd0">https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/220a65615218d5c9cc9e4785a3234bd0</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>Met Office. (2022). <italic>UK Climate Projections: Headline findings (Version 4.0).</italic> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/api/assets/file/ukcp18_headline_findings_v4_aug22pdf?prefix=assets">https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/api/assets/file/ukcp18_headline_findings_v4_aug22pdf?prefix=assets</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>Met Office. (2026). <italic>Effects of climate change</italic>. Retrieved April 20, 2026, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://weather.metoffice.gov.uk/climate-change/effects-of-climate-change">https://weather.metoffice.gov.uk/climate-change/effects-of-climate-change</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. (2025). <italic>Global Historical Climatology Network daily (GHCN-Daily) (version 3)</italic> [Data set]. Retrieved April 20, 2026, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/global-historical-climatology-network-daily">https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/global-historical-climatology-network-daily</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>Palmer, M., Howard, T., Tinker, J., Lowe, J., Bricheno, L., Calvert, D., Edwards, T., Gregory, J., Harris, G., Krijnen, J., Pickering, M., Roberts, C., &amp; Wolf, J. (2018). <italic>UKCP18 marine report</italic>. Met Office Hadley Centre. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/ukcp18/science-reports/UKCP18-Marine-report.pdf">https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/pub/data/weather/uk/ukcp18/science-reports/UKCP18-Marine-report.pdf</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level. (2026). <italic>Tide gauge data</italic> [Data set]. Retrieved April 20, 2026, from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/">https://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>Ramsay, J. O., &amp; Silverman, B. W. (2002). <italic>Applied functional data analysis: Methods and case studies</italic>. Springer. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/b98886">https://doi.org/10.1007/b98886</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>Rogo, B., Garrido, J., &amp; Demartis, S. (2025). The Italian Actuarial Climate Index: A National Implementation Within the Emerging European Framework. <italic>Risks</italic>, <italic>13</italic>(10), Article 192. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13100192">https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13100192</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>Shang, H. L. (2014). A survey of functional principal component analysis. <italic>AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis</italic>, <italic>98</italic>(2), 121–142. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-013-0213-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-013-0213-1</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>Zhou, N., Vilar-Zanón, J.-L., Garrido, J., &amp; Heras Martínez, A. J. (2023). On the definition of an actuarial climate index for the Iberian Peninsula. <italic>Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles</italic>, (29), 37–59. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.26360/2023_3">https://doi.org/10.26360/2023_3</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
  <fn id="fn1">
    <label>1</label><p>The North American ACI is computed at the
    regional level, and the sea level component is omitted in its two
    land-locked regions. Since the UKACI is constructed as a single
    national index, sea level is included in the composite for the
    country as a whole, in line with the Iberian and French
    implementations.</p>
  </fn>
  <fn id="fn2">
    <label>2</label><p>The North American ACI is based on GHCNDEX, a
    gridded dataset from GHCN-Daily station observations (American
    Academy of Actuaries et al., 2018). The Iberian and French indices
    are both computed from the ERA5-Land reanalysis (Zhou et al., 2023;
    Garrido et al., 2026).</p>
  </fn>
  <fn id="fn3">
    <label>3</label><p>Since the six components are time series,
    functional principal component analysis (FPCA) would be the natural
    framework for characterising their dominant modes of temporal
    variation (Ramsay and Silverman 2002; Shang 2014). In this paper,
    however, PCA serves a more limited purpose: it provides a
    data-driven alternative to the equal weights of the composite index
    by exploiting the cross-sectional covariance among the six
    standardised components.</p>
  </fn>
  <fn id="fn4">
    <label>4</label><p>Unlike the AACI, whose reference period begins in
    1981, the UKAACI is computed over the same 1961-2024 study period
    and with the same 1961-1990 reference period as the UKACI, so that
    the two indices are directly comparable.</p>
  </fn>
  <fn id="fn5">
    <label>5</label><p>We use the current version of the AACI (v2.0),
    which is based on four components. In the earlier 2018 framework
    (v1.0), cool temperature and consecutive dry days were included in
    the composite calculation, whereas wind speed was excluded. Further
    details on these modifications are provided in Actuaries Institute
    (2025).</p>
  </fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
