Clasificación de siniestros de seguros relacionados con el clima mediante el uso de gradient boosting

Autores/as

  • George Tzougas Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh (United Kingdom) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4072-1454
  • Viet Dang Ar Genesis (United Kingdom)
  • Asif John Ar Genesis (United Kingdom)
  • Stathis Kroustalis University of Economics and Business, Athens (Greece)
  • Debashish Dey WTW (United Kingdom)
  • Konstantin Kutzkov Teva Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26360/2022_6

Palabras clave:

siniestros de seguros relacionados con las tormentas, aprendizaje conjunto, árboles de decisión, boosting

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es aplicar uno de los enfoques de aprendizaje supervisado más representativos, el método de conjunto basado en árboles de decisión denominado gradient boosting, para clasificar el número de siniestros causados por tormentas en Grecia utilizando datos de una importante compañía de seguros que opera en este país. Por último, se utiliza un algoritmo de aprendizaje automático para clasificar el número de siniestros que se han producido como consecuencia de un "evento de tormenta" en 3 categorías: "ningún siniestro", "1 siniestro", "2 o más siniestros".

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Ahmed, O., & Serra, T. (2015). Economic analysis of the introduction of agricultural revenue insurance contracts in Spain using statistical copulas. Agricultural Economics, 46(1), 69-79.

Breiman, L. (1996). Stacked regressions. Machine learning, 24(1), 49-64.

Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software.

Charbuty, B., & Abdulazeez, A. (2021). Classification based on decision tree algorithm for machine learning. Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends, 2(01), 20-28.

Choudhury, A., Jones, J., Okine, A., & Choudhury, R. (2016). Drought- triggered index insurance using cluster analysis of rainfall affected by climate change. Journal of Insurance Issues, 169-186.

Clemen, R. (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International journal of forecasting, 5(4),559-583.

Daron, J. D., & Stainforth, D. A. (2014). Assessing pricing assumptions for weather index insurance in a changing climate. Climate Risk Management, 1, 76-91.

Dietterich, T., et al. (2002). Ensemble learning. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 2(1), 110-125. European Environment Agency (2022). What is CORINE land cover? https://www.eea.europa.eu/help/faq/what-iscorine-land-cover

Freund, Y., Schapire, R., & Abe, N. (1999). A short introduction to boosting. Journal-Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 14(771-780), 1612.

Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 1189-1232.

Friedman, J. H., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2001). The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics.

Hyafil, L., & Rivest, R. (1976). Constructing optimal binary decision trees is NP-complete. Inf. Process. Lett., 5(1), 15-17.

Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T. (2017). Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3146-3154.

Knighton, J., Buchanan, B., Guzman, C., Elliott, R., White, E., & Rahm, B. (2020). Predicting flood insurance claims with hydrologic and socioeconomic demographics via machine learning: Exploring the roles of topography, minority populations, and political dissimilarity. Journal of Environmental Management, 272, 111051.

Leblois, A., & Quirion, P. (2013). Agricultural insurances based on meteorological indices: realizations, methods and research challenges. Meteorological Applications, 20(1), 1-9.

Lyubchich, V., Newlands, N., Ghahari, A., Mahdi, T., & Gel, Y. (2019). Insurance risk assessment in the face of climate change: Integrating data science and statistics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 11(4), e1462.

Mobley, W., Sebastian, A., Blessing, R., Highfield, W., Stearns, L., & Brody, S. (2021). Quantification of continuous flood hazard using random forest classification and flood insurance claims at large spatial scales: a pilot study in Southeast Texas. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 21(2), 807-822.

Odening M., & Shen, Z. (2014). Challenges of insuring weather risk in agriculture. Agricultural Finance Review, 74(2), 188-199.

Perrone, M. (1993). Improving regression estimation: Averaging methods for variance reduction with extensions to general convex measure optimization [PhD thesis]. Physics Department, Brown University, Providence, RI.

Rohrbeck, C., Eastoe, E., Frigessi, A., & Tawn, J. (2018). Extreme value modelling of water-related insurance claims. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 12(1), 246-282.

Tack, J., & Ubilava, D. (2015). Climate and agricultural risk: measuring the effect of enso on uscrop insurance. Agricultural Economics, 46(2), 245-257.

Tesselaar, M., Wouter Botzen, W.J., & Aerts, J. (2020). Impacts of climate change and remote natural catastrophes on EU flood insurance markets: An analysis of soft and hard reinsurance markets for flood coverage. Atmosphere, 11(2), 146.

Wolpert, D. (1992). Stacked generalization. Neural networks, 5(2), 241-259.

Yang, Q., Shen X., Yang, F., Anagnostou, E., He, K., Mo, C., Seyyedi,H., Kettner, A. & Zhang, Q. (2022). Predicting flood property insurance claims over conus, fusing big earth observation data. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(3), E791-E809.

Descargas

Publicado

15-12-2022

Cómo citar

Tzougas, G., Dang, V., John, A., Kroustalis, S., Dey, D., & Kutzkov, K. (2022). Clasificación de siniestros de seguros relacionados con el clima mediante el uso de gradient boosting. Anales Del Instituto De Actuarios Españoles, (28), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.26360/2022_6

Número

Sección

Artículos de investigación